Adaptive information source selection during hypothesis testing
Files
(Published version)
Date
2014
Authors
Hendrickson, A.
Perfors, A.
Navarro, D.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Conference paper
Citation
Program of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2014, pp.607-612
Statement of Responsibility
Andrew T. Hendrickson, Amy F. Perfors, Daniel J. Navarro
Conference Name
36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014) (23 Jul 2014 - 26 Jul 2014 : Quebec City, Canada)
Abstract
We consider how the information sources people use to test hypotheses change as the sparsity of the hypotheses – the proportion of items in the hypothesis space they include – changes. Specifically, we focus on understanding how requests for positive and negative evidence, which have been shown to be sensitive to hypothesis sparsity (Hendrickson, Navarro, & Perfors, in prep), are influenced by requests for specific instances, which show a positive bias and less sensitivity to sparsity (Markant & Gureckis, 2013). We find that people modify their information requests as a function of the sparsity of the hypotheses and they do so in this task primarily by by manipulating the rate of requesting positive and negative evidence. Furthermore, by simulating the set of possible remaining hypotheses, we find that people were most likely to select the information source that maximized the expected reduction in uncertainty across hypotheses. We conclude by discussing the implications of these results for models of hypothesis testing.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© The Authors