Wotton v Queensland (2012) 285 ALR 1
Date
2012
Authors
Ambrose, W.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Adelaide Law Review, 2012; 33(1):281-285
Statement of Responsibility
Warwick Ambrose
Conference Name
Abstract
In Wotton v Queensland the High Court ('Court') considered whether restrictions on a parolee's ability to attend public meetings and engage with the media breached the implied freedom of political communication. This case note will examine whether the Court's approach in Wotton was consistent with the underlying basis of the implied freedom by examining its application to executive bodies, the requirement that the law burden political communication and the treatment of state based political communication.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright © 2012 The University of Adelaide