Wotton v Queensland (2012) 285 ALR 1

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAmbrose, W.
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractIn Wotton v Queensland the High Court ('Court') considered whether restrictions on a parolee's ability to attend public meetings and engage with the media breached the implied freedom of political communication. This case note will examine whether the Court's approach in Wotton was consistent with the underlying basis of the implied freedom by examining its application to executive bodies, the requirement that the law burden political communication and the treatment of state based political communication.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityWarwick Ambrose
dc.description.urihttp://www.law.adelaide.edu.au/review/issues/
dc.identifier.citationAdelaide Law Review, 2012; 33(1):281-285
dc.identifier.issn0065-1915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/76845
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAdelaide Law Review Association
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 The University of Adelaide
dc.titleWotton v Queensland (2012) 285 ALR 1
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Law publications