Dexamethasone for Cardiac Surgery: A Practice Preference–Randomized Consent Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Date

2024

Authors

Myles, P.S.
Dieleman, J.M.
Munting, K.E.
Forbes, A.
Martin, C.A.
Smith, J.A.
McGiffin, D.
Verheijen, L.P.J.
Wallace, S.
Myles, P.S.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Anesthesiology, 2024; 141(5):859-869

Statement of Responsibility

Paul S. Myles, Jan M. Dieleman, Karin E. Munting, Andrew Forbes, Catherine A. Martin, Julian A. Smith, David McGiffin, Lieke P. J. Verheijen, Sophie Wallace, for the DECS-II Investigators and the ANZCA Clinical Trials Network

Conference Name

Abstract

Background: High-dose corticosteroids have been used to attenuate the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, but patient outcome benefits remain unclear. The primary aim was to determine whether using dexamethasone was superior to not using dexamethasone to increase the number of home days in the first 30 days after cardiac surgery. The secondary aim was to evaluate efficiency, value, and impact of the novel trial design. Methods: This pragmatic, international trial incorporating a prerandomized consent design favoring local practice enrolled patients undergoing cardiac surgery across seven hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to dexamethasone 1 mg/kg or not (control). The primary outcome was the number of days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery (“home days”). Secondary outcomes included prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 48 h), sepsis, renal failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Results: Of 2,562 patients assessed for eligibility, 1,951 were randomized (median age, 63 yr; 80% male). The median number of home days was 23.0 (interquartile range, 20.1 to 24.1) in the no dexamethasone group and 23.1 (interquartile range, 20.1 to 24.6) in the dexamethasone group (median difference, 0.1; 95% CI, –0.3 to 0.5; P = 0.66). The rates of prolonged mechanical ventilation (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.08), sepsis (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.82), renal failure (risk ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12), myocardial infarction (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.30 to 4.82), stroke (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.08), and death (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.22 to 2.35) were comparable between groups (all P > 0.10). Dexamethasone reduced intensive care unit stay (median, 29 h; interquartile range, 22 to 50 h vs. median, 43 h; interquartile range, 24 to 72 h; P = 0.004). The authors’ novel trial design was highly efficient (89.3% enrollment). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, high-dose dexamethasone decreased intensive care unit stay but did not increase the number of home days after surgery.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record