Disability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners

dc.contributor.authorSpyrou, E.
dc.contributor.authorClausen, M.
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractDisability discrimination in schools is prohibited by state and federal anti-discrimination laws. If issues arise, complainants may seek redress through formal or informal complaint pathways. These pathways often utilise confidential alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’), and as such, little is known about how the conflict inherent in such complaints is resolved, if at all. Despite this gap, the recent Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability made recommendations to amend these laws without inquiring into how these complaints were resolved or whether the advantages of ADR are realised. This article employs thematic analysis to address this gap by exploring the experiences of two participant groups involved in these confidential education complaints about students with disability-related challenging behaviours: parent participants and resolution practitioners.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityElpitha Spyrou, and Marianne Clausen
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal, 2024; 47(4):1317-1347
dc.identifier.doi10.53637/SATC4613
dc.identifier.issn0313-0096
dc.identifier.orcidSpyrou, E. [0000-0001-7633-921X]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/146617
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
dc.rightsCopyright Status Unknown
dc.source.urihttps://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/article/disability-discrimination-in-education-investigating-the-adr-experiences-of-parents-and-practitioners
dc.subjectdisability; disability discrimination; SChools; education; anti-discrimination laws; Royal Comission
dc.titleDisability Discrimination in Education: Investigating the ADR Experiences of Parents and Practitioners
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished online

Files

Collections