Adult regularization of inconsistent input depends on pragmatic factors

dc.contributor.authorPerfors, A.
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionPublished online: 06 Jan 2016.
dc.description.abstractIn a variety of domains, adults who are given input that is only partially consistent do not discard the inconsistent portion (regularize) but rather maintain the probability of consistent and inconsistent portions in their behavior (probability match). This research investigates the possibility that adults probability match, at least in part, because of two pragmatic assumptions they bring to the learning problem: (a) that the variation they see is predictable rather than random and (b) that their goal is to correctly learn that variation. Evidence from two experiments demonstrates that when either assumption is eliminated, people probability match less and therefore regularize more. These results are discussed with respect to age and domain differences in regularization.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmy Perfors
dc.identifier.citationLanguage Learning and Development, 2016; 12(2):138-155
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15475441.2015.1052449
dc.identifier.issn1547-5441
dc.identifier.issn1547-3341
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/106716
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE120102378
dc.rights© 2016 Taylor & Francis
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052449
dc.titleAdult regularization of inconsistent input depends on pragmatic factors
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files