Perioperative mortality after hemiarthroplasty related to fixation method: A study based on the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Files

hdl_68996.pdf (581.92 KB)
  (Published version)

Date

2011

Authors

Costain, D.
Whitehouse, S.
Pratt, N.
Graves, S.
Ryan, P.
Crawford, R.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Acta Orthopaedica, 2011; 82(3):275-281

Statement of Responsibility

Darren J Costain, Sarah L Whitehouse, Nicole L Pratt, Stephen E Graves, Philip Ryan, and Ross W Crawford

Conference Name

Abstract

Background and purpose: The appropriate fixation method for hemiarthroplasty of the hip as it relates to implant survivorship and patient mortality is a matter of ongoing debate. We examined the influence of fixation method on revision rate and mortality. Methods: We analyzed approximately 25,000 hemiarthroplasty cases from the AOA National Joint Replacement Registry. Deaths at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year were compared for all patients and among subgroups based on implant type. Results: Patients treated with cemented monoblock hemiarthroplasty had a 1.7-times higher day-1 mortality compared to uncemented monoblock components (p < 0.001). This finding was reversed by 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). Modular hemiarthroplasties did not reveal a difference in mortality between fixation methods at any time point. Interpretation: This study shows lower (or similar) overall mortality with cemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Open Access - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record