A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential

Pitcher, J.; Doeltgen, S.; Goldsworthy, M.; Schneider, L.; Vallence, A.; Smith, A.; Semmler, J.; McDonnell, M.; Ridding, M.

doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011

A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential

Date

2015

Authors

Pitcher, J.

Doeltgen, S.

Goldsworthy, M.

Schneider, L.

Vallence, A.

Smith, A.

Semmler, J.

McDonnell, M.

Ridding, M.

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-2341

Statement of Responsibility

Julia B. Pitcher, Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Luke A. Schneider, Ann-Maree Vallence, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Michelle N. McDonnell, Michael C. Ridding

DOI

10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011

Abstract

Abstract not available

Rights

Published Version

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011

Persistent link to this record

http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98582

Full item page

A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential

Date

Authors

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Citation

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

DOI

Abstract

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Published Version

Call number

Persistent link to this record