A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential
| dc.contributor.author | Pitcher, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Doeltgen, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goldsworthy, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schneider, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vallence, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Semmler, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McDonnell, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ridding, M. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract not available | |
| dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Julia B. Pitcher, Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Luke A. Schneider, Ann-Maree Vallence, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Michelle N. McDonnell, Michael C. Ridding | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-2341 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1388-2457 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1872-8952 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Pitcher, J. [0000-0002-9648-7540] | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Goldsworthy, M. [0000-0002-0688-9475] | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Smith, A. [0000-0001-6316-2259] | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Semmler, J. [0000-0003-0260-8047] | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Ridding, M. [0000-0001-5657-9136] | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98582 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ireland | |
| dc.rights | © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011 | |
| dc.subject | Corticomotor stimulus–response curves; Resting motor threshold; Ageing; Children; Motor evoked potential; First dorsal interosseous | |
| dc.title | A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published |