A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential

dc.contributor.authorPitcher, J.
dc.contributor.authorDoeltgen, S.
dc.contributor.authorGoldsworthy, M.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, L.
dc.contributor.authorVallence, A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, A.
dc.contributor.authorSemmler, J.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonnell, M.
dc.contributor.authorRidding, M.
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractAbstract not available
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJulia B. Pitcher, Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Luke A. Schneider, Ann-Maree Vallence, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Michelle N. McDonnell, Michael C. Ridding
dc.identifier.citationClinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-2341
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011
dc.identifier.issn1388-2457
dc.identifier.issn1872-8952
dc.identifier.orcidPitcher, J. [0000-0002-9648-7540]
dc.identifier.orcidGoldsworthy, M. [0000-0002-0688-9475]
dc.identifier.orcidSmith, A. [0000-0001-6316-2259]
dc.identifier.orcidSemmler, J. [0000-0003-0260-8047]
dc.identifier.orcidRidding, M. [0000-0001-5657-9136]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/98582
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland
dc.rights© 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011
dc.subjectCorticomotor stimulus–response curves; Resting motor threshold; Ageing; Children; Motor evoked potential; First dorsal interosseous
dc.titleA comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files