Perceptions and Misconceptions about the Undergraduate Laboratory from Chemistry, Physics and Biology Academics
Date
2020
Authors
Buntine, M.A.
Silva, K.B.D.
Kable, S.H.
Lim, K.F.
Pyke, S.M.
Read, J.R.
Sharma, M.D.
Yeung, A.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 2020; 28(4):1-15
Statement of Responsibility
Mark A. Buntine, Karen Burke da Silva, Scott H. Kable, Kieran F. Lim, Simon M. Pyke, Justin R. Read, Manjula D. Sharma, and Alexandra Yeung
Conference Name
Abstract
The undergraduate laboratory occupies a large fraction of science students’ time. Over 3000 students were asked to rate their laboratory learning experience using 12 metrics. 362 academics were asked to predict which of these 12 aspects of the student experience would correlate with the overall laboratory learning experience. Responses from academics in biology, chemistry and physics departments, and from the USA and Australia, are statistically the same. However, the correlation between these staff predictions and student results is poor. The student results are consistent with extant educational research, but it appears that these findings are not reaching those who are responsible for developing undergraduate laboratory courses. There is a great need for educational research to be made more accessible for academics who are trained in scientific, but not in educational research.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright Status Unknown