Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Antimicrobial Mapping Survey

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMaher, D.
dc.contributor.authorSluggett, J.K.
dc.contributor.authorSoriano, J.
dc.contributor.authorHull, D.-A.
dc.contributor.authorHillock, N.T.
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To explore antimicrobial management processes in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs), including antimicrobial prescribing, supply, administration, and documentation to inform surveillance activities. Design: Voluntary, online cross-sectional survey. Setting and Participants: The survey was disseminated to all South Australian RACFs (n = 237) seeking participation from an infection prevention and control lead (preferred respondent), a nurse or senior RACF staff member, or an aged care pharmacist. Methods: The survey was open during May-June 2023. Questions aimed to understand clinical and medication management systems, sources of antimicrobial prescription and supply, management by external health care providers and documentation of antimicrobial administration. A process map of antimicrobial management in RACFs was developed. Results: Of the 54 RACFs included in the analysis (29.5% response rate), most used an electronic clinical documentation system (74.1%) or a hybrid electronic paper-based system (22.2%). Medication charts were either electronic (81.0%), hybrid (5.6%), or paper-based (13.0%). Antimicrobials were prescribed by the resident's usual general practitioner, but also by locums, hospital or specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, virtual care physicians, and dentists. Oral, topical, and inhaled antimicrobial formulations were usually supplied by community pharmacies, and intravenous formulations were predominately supplied by hospitals for administration by outreach nurses. Almost all RACFs (96.2%) had imprest stock of antimicrobials that included both oral and intravenous formulations. Antimicrobials were predominately administered by an enrolled nurse or a registered nurse. Conclusions and Implications: Antimicrobial management in RACFs is complex, particularly during care transitions. Multiple prescribers and sources of antimicrobials, use of different systems for clinical documentation, particularly by external health care providers, and clinical governance relating to imprest supplies were identified as key areas where medication management could be improved. Addressing these gaps will facilitate comprehensive, real-time antimicrobial surveillance in Australian RACFs.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDorsa Maher, Janet K. Sluggett, Julian Soriano, Dee-Anne Hull, Nadine T. Hillock
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024; 25(9):105144-1-105144-7
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105144
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610
dc.identifier.issn1538-9375
dc.identifier.orcidHillock, N.T. [0000-0003-2245-3740]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/143131
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT2016277
dc.rights© 2024 Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association.
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105144
dc.subjectAntimicrobial; antimicrobial stewardship; nursing homes; long-term care; surveillance; electronic prescribing
dc.titleSurveillance of Antimicrobial Use in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Antimicrobial Mapping Survey
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Research Outputs