Induction, overhypotheses, and the shape bias: Some arguments and evidence for rational constructivism
Date
2009
Authors
Xu, F.
Dewar, K.
Perfors, A.
Editors
Hood, B.
Santos, L.
Santos, L.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Book chapter
Citation
The origins of object knowledge, 2009 / Hood, B., Santos, L. (ed./s), pp.263-284
Statement of Responsibility
Fei Xu, Kathryn Dewar and Amy Perfors
Conference Name
Abstract
The authors in this chapter focus on a case study of how object representations in infants interact with early word learning, particularly the nature of the so-called 'shape bias'. A short review of the controversies in this subfield is used to illustrate the two dominant views of cognitive development, which can be roughly classified as nativist or empiricist. Also presented are theoretical arguments and new empirical evidence for a rational constructivist view of cognitive development. The authors' goal in this chapter is to argue for a new approach to the study of cognitive development, one that is strongly committed to both innate concepts and representations, as well as powerful inductive learning mechanisms. In addition to discussing the 'shape bias' and how it relates to object representations, generality of the approach is briefly discussed.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
2009 Copyright Oxford University Press