Vaginal pressure sensor measurement during maximal voluntary pelvic floor contraction correlates with vaginal birth and pelvic organ prolapse—A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorParkinson, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorKarjalainen, P.K.
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, S.
dc.contributor.authorPapageorgiou, A.W.
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, M.
dc.contributor.authorArkwright, J.W.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, N.
dc.contributor.authorWerkmeister, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorDavies-Tuck, M.
dc.contributor.authorGargett, C.E.
dc.contributor.authorRosamilia, A.
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractAims To measure the force applied along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls in a cohort of 46 patients measured by a fiber-optic pressure sensor and determine if this correlates with vaginal parity and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods An intravaginal fiber-optic sensor measured pressure at nine locations along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls during a maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction (MVC). An automated probe dilation cycle measured the tissue resistance incorporating the vagina and surrounding anatomy. MVC and resting tissue resistance (RTR) were assessed between subjects grouped by the number of vaginal births and prolapse stage. Results A previous vaginal birth was associated with a significant threefold decrease in the overall anterior pressure measurement during MVC. Decreased anterior pressure measurements were observed at Sensors 1 and 3 (distal vagina) and, posteriorly at Sensors 4–6 (midvagina). Women with Stage 2 posterior prolapse exhibited a decreased MVC pressure in the midvagina than those with Stage 0/1. In this pilot study, there was no difference in the vaginal wall RTR according to previous vaginal birth or stage of prolapse. Conclusion This pilot study found that a decrease in vaginal pressure measured during MVC is associated with vaginal birth and with posterior POP. Greater sample size is required to assess the role of resting tissue pressure measurement.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLuke A. Parkinson, Päivi K. Karjalainen, Shayanti Mukherjee, Anthony W. Papageorgiou, Mugdha Kulkarni, John W. Arkwright, Natharnia Young, Jerome A. Werkmeister, Miranda Davies, Tuck, Caroline E. Gargett, Anna Rosamilia
dc.identifier.citationNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2022; 41(2):592-600
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.24882
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/148887
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1081944
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1042298
dc.rights© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24882
dc.subjectfiber‐optic pressure sensor; parity; pelvic organ prolapse; tissue resistance; vaginal pressure
dc.subject.meshPelvic Floor
dc.subject.meshVagina
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPilot Projects
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshMuscle Contraction
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshPelvic Organ Prolapse
dc.titleVaginal pressure sensor measurement during maximal voluntary pelvic floor contraction correlates with vaginal birth and pelvic organ prolapse—A pilot study
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections