Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Pediatric functional lung imaging and pulmonary function testing: A scoping review protocol

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBruorton, M.
dc.contributor.authorGreenslade, S.
dc.contributor.authorPerveen, S.
dc.contributor.authorDonnelley, M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, A.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, J.
dc.contributor.authorParsons, D.
dc.contributor.authorGoddard, T.
dc.contributor.authorCarson-Chahhoud, K.
dc.contributor.authorTai, A.
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective: This scoping review aims to identify current and emerging functional lung imaging techniques that have been used in pediatric cohorts and how these techniques have been compared to pulmonary function tests. Introduction: Functional lung imaging enables the assessment of distribution of pulmonary parameters—including ventilation, perfusion, gas exchange, and biomechanics—to be mapped and quantified non-invasively throughout the lungs. In comparison to pulmonary function testing, functional lung imaging can provide additional clinically relevant information on the regional and spatial localization of lung disease. Pulmonary functional imaging has the potential to significantly benefit a pediatric cohort, giving clinicians an additional tool in assessing and managing pediatric lung disease. Inclusion criteria: Functional lung imaging techniques that have been investigated and compared or correlated with a pulmonary function test in pediatric cohorts will be identified and reviewed. Quantitative study designs and functional lung imaging techniques used in reviews and conference abstracts will be included if there is a comparative pulmonary function test. Gray literature will be screened for evidence of new and emerging technologies. Established author opinion will also be sought on new and emerging technologies in pediatric functional lung imaging. Methods: Key sources to be searched include MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts against inclusion criteria. Extracted data will include details about the concept, context, study methods, and key information relevant to the study question. Data will be presented in tabular format, accompanied by a narrative synthesis. Details of the review can be found in Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SNUC6
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMatthew Bruorton, Sarah Greenslade, Shagufta Perveen, Martin Donnelley, Antonia O, Connor, Jessica Phillips, David Parsons, Thomas Goddard, Kristin Carson-Chahhoud, Andrew Tai
dc.identifier.citationJBI evidence synthesis, 2025; 23(7):1-7
dc.identifier.doi10.11124/JBIES-24-00377
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.orcidBruorton, M. [0000-0003-0737-0947]
dc.identifier.orcidPerveen, S. [0000-0001-8804-3635]
dc.identifier.orcidDonnelley, M. [0000-0002-5320-7756]
dc.identifier.orcidPhillips, J. [0000-0002-3253-5857]
dc.identifier.orcidParsons, D. [0000-0002-8775-3501] [0000-0003-1746-3290]
dc.identifier.orcidTai, A. [0000-0001-9240-5416]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/145249
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.rights© 2025 JBI
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-24-00377
dc.subjectfunctional lung imaging; pediatric; pulmonary function testing
dc.titlePediatric functional lung imaging and pulmonary function testing: A scoping review protocol
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Research Outputs