In Vivo investigation of xenotransplanted human blood-derived scaffold into mice as a biodegradable construct for improvement of pelvic floor repair

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBehnia-Willison, F.
dc.contributor.authorAryan, P.
dc.contributor.authorSalehnia, M.
dc.contributor.authorWillison, N.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, T.T.T.
dc.contributor.authorTansu, N.
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, D.
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective: We developed an autologous, novel human blood-derived scaffold (hBDS) to improve pelvic floor disorders. Both in vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation were investigated and compared by subcutaneous implantation, in the abdominal wall, and the back muscle of mice. Methods and Materials: After preparing the scaffold, it was xenotransplanted subcutaneously, and in vivo biodegradation and host responses were assessed morphologically using hematoxylin, eosin, and Masson’s trichrome staining over 6 weeks. Immunohistochemistry for the CD136 marker was conducted to evaluate vascularization. In another series of experiments, the scaffold was sutured at multiple points on the abdominal wall and back muscle to prolong its biodegradation time and assess the scar formation around the transplantation site. Results: Three days after implantation, no infection or severe inflammation was observed, and the scaffold was surrounded by connective tissue and fibroblasts, indicating initial scaffold degradation. By 1 week, the scaffold exhibited high biodegradation and increased fibroblast infiltration. Scaffold degradation was extensive at 2 weeks, with continued fibroblast infiltration and new collagen deposition. By 3 weeks, the scaffold had completely degraded, with minimal inflammation. The normal dermal structure was restored by weeks four to six after transplantation. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the neovascularization at one- and 2-week post- transplantation. Suturing the scaffold on the peritoneum and back muscle resulted in higher fibroblast infiltration and collagen formation around the suture compared to the non-suture group, with no morphological differences between the abdominal wall and back muscle reactions. Conclusion: The novel human blood-derived scaffold demonstrated biodegradation and high biocompatibility. Suturing the scaffold on the abdominal wall or back muscle effectively improves clinical symptoms, while further improvements are needed for its clinical application.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFariba Behnia-Willison, Pouria Aryan, Mojdeh Salehnia, Nadia Willison, Tran T. T. Nguyen, Nelson Tansu, Derek Abbott
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2025; 13:1627538-1-1627538-15
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fbioe.2025.1627538
dc.identifier.issn2296-4185
dc.identifier.issn2296-4185
dc.identifier.orcidTansu, N. [0000-0002-3811-9125]
dc.identifier.orcidAbbott, D. [0000-0002-0945-2674]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/148436
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL240100217
dc.rights© 2025 Behnia-Willison, Aryan, Salehnia, Willison, Nguyen, Tansu and Abbott. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1627538
dc.subjectautologous
dc.subjectbiocompatibility
dc.subjectbiodegradation
dc.subjectblood-derived
dc.subjectscaffold
dc.titleIn Vivo investigation of xenotransplanted human blood-derived scaffold into mice as a biodegradable construct for improvement of pelvic floor repair
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hdl_148436.pdf
Size:
6.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download

Collections

Research Outputs