Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification
Date
2025
Authors
Villani, R.M.
Terrill, B.
Tudini, E.
McKenzie, M.E.
Cliffe, C.C.
Hahn, C.N.
Lundie, B.
Mattiske, T.
Matotek, E.
McEwen, A.E.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
American Journal of Human Genetics, 2025; 112(6):1489-1495
Statement of Responsibility
Rehan M. Villani, Bronwyn Terrill, Emma Tudini, Maddison E. McKenzie, Corrina C. Cliffe, Christopher N. Hahn, Ben Lundie, Tessa Mattiske, Ebony Matotek, Abbye E. McEwen, Sarah L. Nickerson, James Breen, Douglas M. Fowler, John Christodoulou, Lea Starita, Alan F. Rubin, and Amanda B. Spurdle
Conference Name
Abstract
When investigating whether a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Functional assays of higher and higher throughput are increasingly being generated and, when appropriate, can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification. Despite functional assay data representing unprecedented value for genomic diagnostics, challenges remain around the application of functional evidence in variant curation. To investigate a growing gap articulated in recent international studies, we surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. The survey results echo the universal difficulty in evaluating functional evidence but expand on this by indicating that even self-proclaimed expert respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified the need for support resources and educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. We then collated a list of 226 functional assays and the evidence strength recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels. Specific assays for more than 45,000 variants were evaluated, but evidence recommendations were generally limited to lower throughput and strength. As an initial step, we provide our collated list of assay evidence as a source of international expert opinion on the evaluation of functional- evidence and conclude that these results highlight an opportunity to develop additional support resources to fully utilize functional evidence in clinical practice.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2025 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.