Mental health and support for rigorous tobacco control strategies in South Australia

Date

2024

Authors

Trigg, J.
Bowden, J.
Morris, J.
Daly, T.
Miller, C.
Bonevski, B.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Tobacco Control, 2024; 35(2):tc-2024-058831-tc-2024-058831

Statement of Responsibility

Joshua Trigg, Jacqueline Bowden, Julia Morris, Tony Daly, Caroline Miller, Billie Bonevski

Conference Name

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco endgame strategy includes policies to end the tobacco epidemic. As tobacco smoking prevalence is higher among people with mental health conditions (MHC), understanding the impact of rigorous tobacco control strategies for this group is critical. This study examined support for five tobacco control strategies among people with MHCs: increasing tobacco product tax, reducing tobacco retail locations, ending tobacco sales in alcohol-licensed venues, limiting retailers to one tobacco point of sale and reduced nicotine in smoked tobacco. Methods: Cross-sectional surveying of a representative sample of 3006 South Australians in 2021 aged ≥15 years included demographic, tobacco control strategy, smoking status and mental health indicators. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the influence of mental health on strategy support. Results: Support was high for all tobacco control strategies, highest for reducing nicotine content (80.4%) and lowest for increasing tobacco tax (67.2%). Support for increased tobacco tax was lower among people with MHCs than for those without by 7.8% (aged 18+ years) to 9.5% (aged 15+ years). People who smoked had significantly lower support for all strategies, and smoking status and MHC did not interact in influencing support. Conclusions: Support for tax-focused strategies was lower among people with MHCs. Retail and productfocused strategies may support equity in public acceptability of tobacco control action. Policy-makers must aim to maximise tobacco endgame support from populations most impacted by tobacco harms when implementing tobacco control strategies. Tax-focused approaches might be enhanced with consultation and advocacy for people with MHCs.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record