Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer
dc.contributor.author | Frazer, H.M.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peña-Solorzano, C.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, C.F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elliott, M.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lippey, J.F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hopper, J.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brotchie, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Carneiro, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | McCarthy, D.J. | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Artificial intelligence (AI) readers of mammograms compare favourably to individual radiologists in detecting breast cancer. However, AI readers cannot perform at the level of multi-reader systems used by screening programs in countries such as Australia, Sweden, and the UK. Therefore, implementation demands human-AI collaboration. Here, we use a large, high-quality retrospective mammography dataset from Victoria, Australia to conduct detailed simulations of five potential AI-integrated screening pathways, and examine human-AI interaction effects to explore automation bias. Operating an AI reader as a second reader or as a high confidence filter improves current screening outcomes by 1.9-2.5% in sensitivity and up to 0.6% in specificity, achieving 4.6-10.9% reduction in assessments and 48-80.7% reduction in human reads. Automation bias degrades performance in multi-reader settings but improves it for single-readers. This study provides insight into feasible approaches for AI-integrated screening pathways and prospective studies necessary prior to clinical adoption. | |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Helen M. L. Frazer, Carlos A. Peña-Solorzano, Chun Fung Kwok, Michael S. Elliott, Yuanhong Chen, Chong Wang, The BRAIx Team, Jocelyn F. Lippey, John L. Hopper, Peter Brotchie, Gustavo Carneiro, Davis J. McCarthy | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nature Communications, 2024; 15(1):7525-1-7525-12 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41467-024-51725-8 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-1723 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-1723 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | Carneiro, G. [0000-0002-5571-6220] | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2440/143505 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Nature Portfolio | |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1195595 | |
dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1195595 | |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51725-8 | |
dc.subject | Breast cancer; Machine learning; Population screening; Radiography; Translational research | |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | |
dc.subject.mesh | Breast Neoplasms | |
dc.subject.mesh | Mammography | |
dc.subject.mesh | Mass Screening | |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensitivity and Specificity | |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective Studies | |
dc.subject.mesh | Artificial Intelligence | |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject.mesh | Victoria | |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | |
dc.subject.mesh | Early Detection of Cancer | |
dc.title | Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.publication-status | Published |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- hdl_143505.pdf
- Size:
- 5.33 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version