Contraception and abortion in a low-fertility setting: the role of seasonal migration
dc.contributor.author | Sevoyan, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Agadjanian, V. | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | CONTEXT: Seasonal labor migration is common among men in many former Soviet republics. Little research has examined contraceptive use and induced abortion among women in such low-fertility, high-migration settings, according to husband’s migration status. METHODS: Combined data from 2,280 respondents of two surveys of married women aged 18–45 in rural Armenia—one conducted in 2005 and one in 2007—were used. Logistic regression analyses examined whether a husband’s migration status was associated with his wife’s current use of the pill or the IUD, or with the probability that she had had a pregnancy that ended in induced abortion. Additional analyses were conducted to determine whether relationships were moderated by household wealth. RESULTS: Women with a migrant husband were less likely than those with a nonmigrant husband to be currently using the pill or the IUD (odds ratio, 0.6); with increased household wealth, the likelihood of method use increased among women with a nonmigrant husband, but decreased slightly among women with a migrant husband. Overall, the probability that a pregnancy ended in abortion did not differ by migration status; however, the likelihood of abortion increased with wealth among women married to a nonmigrant, but not among those married to a migrant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their husband’s absence, women married to a migrant may have an unwanted pregnancy rate similar to that of women married to a nonmigrant. Improved access to modern contraceptive methods is likely to be positively associated with contraceptive use among women with a nonmigrant husband, but not among those with a migrant husband. | |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Arusyak Sevoyan and Victor Agadjanian | |
dc.identifier.citation | International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2013; 39(3):124-132 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1363/3912413 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1944-0391 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1944-0405 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | Sevoyan, A. [0000-0001-7711-8427] | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/80996 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Alan Guttmacher Institute | |
dc.rights | Copyright status unknown | |
dc.source.uri | http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3912413.html | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Contraception | |
dc.subject | Abortion, Induced | |
dc.subject | Logistic Models | |
dc.subject | Attitude to Health | |
dc.subject | Contraception Behavior | |
dc.subject | Marriage | |
dc.subject | Seasons | |
dc.subject | Emigration and Immigration | |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | |
dc.subject | Poverty | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Rural Population | |
dc.subject | Health Services Accessibility | |
dc.subject | Armenia | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Young Adult | |
dc.title | Contraception and abortion in a low-fertility setting: the role of seasonal migration | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.publication-status | Published |