In my opinion: importance of discussion and criticism

dc.contributor.author	Hutchinson, T.
dc.date.issued	2004
dc.description	© Wildlife Society
dc.description.abstract	Krausman et. al (2003) were rather dismissive of the value of published comments on journal articles. I argue that such discussion is important and there should be more of it. The chief reason is the outcome (correction of error) but the process is valuable too.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility	T.P. Hutchinson
dc.identifier.citation	Wildlife Society Bulletin: perspectives on wildlife conservation and sustainable use, 2004; 32(1):286-287
dc.identifier.doi	10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[286:IMOIOD]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.issn	0091-7648
dc.identifier.issn	1938-5463
dc.identifier.orcid	Hutchinson, T. [0000-0002-4429-0885]
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2440/36428
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	Wildlife Soc
dc.source.uri	https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[286:imoiod]2.0.co;2
dc.subject	Comments
dc.subject	postpublication criticism
dc.subject	replies
dc.subject	scientific communication
dc.title	In my opinion: importance of discussion and criticism
dc.type	Journal article
pubs.publication-status	Published

Collections