The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies

Date

2025

Authors

Barker, T.H.
Hasanoff, S.
Aromataris, E.
Stone, J.C.
Leonardi-Bee, J.
Sears, K.
Klugar, M.
Tufanaru, C.
Moola, S.
Liu, X.-L.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

JBI evidence synthesis, 2025; 1-8

Statement of Responsibility

Timothy H. Barker, Sabira Hasanoff, Edoardo Aromataris, Jennifer C. Stone, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Kim Sears, Miloslav Klugar, Catalin Tufanaru, Sandeep Moola, Xian-Liang Liu, Zachary Munn

Conference Name

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies are a useful observational study design that provides a snapshot of a population’s health status at a specific moment in time. Analytical cross-sectional studies are often included in systematic reviews investigating the etiology or risk of diseases, and descriptive cross-sectional studies are often used to determine the prevalence of a disease. As required of all studies that meet eligibility criteria for a systematic review, analytical cross-sectional studies should be subjected to appropriate critical appraisal of their methodological quality to determine the risk of bias. The JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group is currently undertaking a comprehensive revision of the entire suite of JBI critical appraisal tools to align with recent advances in risk of bias assessment. This paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for risk of bias assessment of analytical cross-sectional studies. Applying tools such as the revised JBI tools within systematic reviews allows for end users to make informed decisions using the evidence. We discuss major changes from the previous iterations of this tool and justify these changes within the context of the broader advancements to risk-of-bias assessment science. We also offer practical guidance for the use of this revised tool, and provide examples for interpreting the results of risk-of-bias assessment for analytical cross-sectional studies to support reviewers including these studies in their systematic reviews.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Published online: June 10, 2025. OnlinePubl

Access Status

Rights

© 2025 JBI

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record