Developing robust lake sediment chronologies using 210Pb, Pu and radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates and macrofossil: A case study from Lake Surprise, Victoria, Australia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDharmarathna, A.
dc.contributor.authorCadd, H.
dc.contributor.authorBarr, C.
dc.contributor.authorFrancke, A.
dc.contributor.authorHua, Q.
dc.contributor.authorChild, D.
dc.contributor.authorHotchkis, M.
dc.contributor.authorZawadzki, A.
dc.contributor.authorGadd, P.
dc.contributor.authorTurney, C.
dc.contributor.authorMarjo, C.E.
dc.contributor.authorTibby, J.
dc.contributor.authorTyler, J.J.
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe development of reliable sediment chronologies is crucial for accurate interpretations of decadal to centuryscale palaeoenvironmental changes in the late Quaternary. Although radiocarbon dating of sedimentary sequences is commonly undertaken, not all the organic fractions are representative of atmospheric ¹⁴C levels, resulting in inaccurate age models. Whilst terrestrial plant macrofossils are widely considered ideal dating material – assuming they are contemporaneous with the horizons being dated – they are often sparse or absent. In this context, radiocarbon dating of pollen extracts is increasingly being used as alternative dating material. Here, we used pollen radiocarbon dating, alongside a suite of macrofossil and bulk sediment dates, to develop a chronology for the Holocene sediments of Lake Surprise, in Victoria, Australia. ²¹⁰Pb activity and Plutonium (Pu) concentrations and isotope ratios were also analysed to constrain the age of the uppermost sediments, augmented with recent historical markers, including the first arrival of Pinus pollen and the date of an earlier coring expedition at the site in 2004. With respect to the radiocarbon dates, we found an age offset between the plant macrofossils and bulk sediment dates of 260 ± 86 ¹⁴C years and an offset of ∼340 ¹⁴C years between plant macrofossil and pollen extracts. In both cases, macrofossil dates appeared to be “younger” than the bulk sediment and pollen dates. The offset between pollen and plant macrofossil dates was found to vary with sediment depth and generally correlate with carbonate concentration in the sediment. Using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), we determined that the pollen extracts were not contaminated by either carbonate or charcoal. However, contamination by algal spores could not be ruled out, and we hypothesise that those algal spores may have assimilated aged dissolved inorganic carbon during periods of higher groundwater influx, thus altering the measured radiocarbon age of the pollen extract. Macrofossil and corrected pollen radiocarbon dates were incorporated in a Bayesian age-depth model which integrated ²¹⁰Pb activities and Pu data and bomb pulse C-14 dates validated using recent historical age markers. Our results suggest that it is possible to generate a robust geochronological framework for Lake Surprise using radiocarbon dating back to at least ∼10,846 cal yr BP.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAsika Dharmarathna, Haidee Cadd, Cameron Barr, Alexander Francke, Quan Hua, David Child, Michael Hotchkis, Atun Zawadzki, Patricia Gadd, Chris Turney, Christopher E. Marjo, John Tibby, Jonathan J. Tyler
dc.identifier.citationQuaternary Geochronology, 2025; 89:101686-1-101686-19
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101686
dc.identifier.issn1871-1014
dc.identifier.issn1878-0350
dc.identifier.orcidBarr, C. [0000-0003-0436-8702]
dc.identifier.orcidFrancke, A. [0000-0002-0370-5802]
dc.identifier.orcidTibby, J. [0000-0002-5897-2932]
dc.identifier.orcidTyler, J.J. [0000-0001-8046-0215]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/147678
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP190102782
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101686
dc.subjectPollen radiocarbon dating; 210Pb dating; Pu isotopes; Fourier transform infrared (FTIR); Bayesian plum modelling; Lake sediment
dc.titleDeveloping robust lake sediment chronologies using 210Pb, Pu and radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates and macrofossil: A case study from Lake Surprise, Victoria, Australia
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Research Outputs