A paradigm shift away from the esp-pk dichotomy: the theory of psychopraxia

dc.contributor.authorStorm, L.
dc.contributor.authorMaitreya, M.
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractThe traditional view in parapsychology is that ESP and PK are separate and distinct categories of psi. However, M. A. Thalbourne's (1982, in press) theory of psychopraxia is put forward as an alternative interpretation of the paranormal that assumes there is no necessity for making that distinction. Central to this theory are 4 components: the self; the so-called pro attitude, or preference for a particular outcome; the set of necessary conditions which, together with the pro attitude, are sufficient for the outcome; and the outcome, or goal state itself. Psychopraxia may operate endosomatically or, as considered in the present case, exosomatically as psi. An examination of 12 major meta-analyses covering 9 paranormal domains is presented as evidence that the mean effect sizes (here taken as "norms") cannot be differentiated by then- magnitude alone in terms of ESP and PK categories. The evidence from these meta-analyses supports instead the single paranormal process postulated hi the theory of psychopraxia. It is further argued that the absence of perceived complexity (a psychological state) in regard to the mechanical setup of the experiment is a necessary condition conducive to psychopraxia. Theoretical, experimental, and meta-analytic findings support the psychopractic hypothesis that the ESP-PK dichotomy is untenable.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Parapsychology, 2000; 64(3):279-300
dc.identifier.issn0022-3387
dc.identifier.orcidStorm, L. [0000-0002-6228-6150]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/3329
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherParapsychology Press Rhine Research Center
dc.titleA paradigm shift away from the esp-pk dichotomy: the theory of psychopraxia
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files