Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
Date
2023
Authors
Pollock, D.
Peters, M.D.J.
Khalil, H.
McInerney, P.
Alexander, L.
Tricco, A.C.
Evans, C.
de Moraes, É.B.
Godfrey, C.M.
Pieper, D.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2023; 21(3):520-532
Statement of Responsibility
Danielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters, Hanan Khalil, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, Andrea C. Tricco, Catrin Evans, Érica Brandão de Moraes, Christina M. Godfrey, Dawid Pieper, Ashrita Saran, Cindy Stern, Zachary Munn
Conference Name
Abstract
Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2023 JBI