Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPollock, D.
dc.contributor.authorPeters, M.D.J.
dc.contributor.authorKhalil, H.
dc.contributor.authorMcInerney, P.
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, L.
dc.contributor.authorTricco, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, C.
dc.contributor.authorde Moraes, É.B.
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorPieper, D.
dc.contributor.authorSaran, A.
dc.contributor.authorStern, C.
dc.contributor.authorMunn, Z.
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractScoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDanielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters, Hanan Khalil, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, Andrea C. Tricco, Catrin Evans, Érica Brandão de Moraes, Christina M. Godfrey, Dawid Pieper, Ashrita Saran, Cindy Stern, Zachary Munn
dc.identifier.citationJBI Evidence Synthesis, 2023; 21(3):520-532
dc.identifier.doi10.11124/jbies-22-00123
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.issn2689-8381
dc.identifier.orcidPollock, D. [0000-0002-6604-0609]
dc.identifier.orcidPeters, M.D.J. [0000-0002-1108-3783]
dc.identifier.orcidStern, C. [0000-0002-0924-5042]
dc.identifier.orcidMunn, Z. [0000-0002-7091-5842]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/140341
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1195676
dc.rights© 2023 JBI
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00123
dc.subjectevidence synthesis; methodology; methods; scoping reviews
dc.titleRecommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Public Health publications